The messages of
Once Upon a Time have been that good always prevails, that all it—whatever
“it” happens to be—takes is belief, and, ad nauseam, that true
love conquers all. However, Hemingway
said, “If two people are truly in love, there’s no way it can all end happily,”
and apologies to Edward Kitsis and Adam Horowitz, but I’m gonna go with Papa on
this one.
Forget, for a
moment, that these messages do not accurately reflect the original messages of the
large body of fairy tales, which were more like, “Everything in the world is
dangerous and will eat/steal you if it possibly can.” Because, of course, this
ABC family drama (distributed by Disney) is not even about to be anything but warm and fuzzy.
Let’s focus
instead on how the unrelenting hammering-home of these messages affects the
plot and characterization.
Everyone knows
plot revolves around conflict. The creators of this show have given us plenty
of conflict. The over-arching magical conflicts between the Evil Queen and the
Dark One, and all of the other Enchanted Woods characters whom they enspelled.
The over-arching domestic conflicts between Regina and Emma over Henry, or
Rumple’s search for his son. The over-arching internal conflicts that rage
within Emma, who longs to trust people but is still hurt at being abandoned and
growing up without a family. Or Regina, who battles between rage and revenge,
and the desire to be a hero and find happiness again.
These conflicts
are, each of them, real and engrossing. (The moments they create could be,
like, a billion times more engrossing if they weren’t saddled with clunky,
cheesy, boring dialogue, but that’s a whole ‘nother thing.)
The plot problem
is that, in their effort to make sure that the messages of “if you only
believe,” and “true love conquers all,” come through loud and clear, the
writers sabotage moments of conflict and drama by almost always reversing the
consequences of big decisions. For instance, [highlight for spoilers] near the end of
the third season, Charming has to give up his heart to re-enact Regina’s dark
curse. While the couple exchange their last love vows, Snow crushes his heart,
killing him. Literally two minutes later, Snow realizes that Charming’s claim
that they were “of one heart” might mean that he can live again, with half of
her heart. She asks Regina to “believe,” puts half her heart in Charming’s chest,
and he comes back to life. Ta da! [spoilers ended]
This is just the
latest and most immediate in a long series of impossible resurrections and/or
immediate about-faces in destiny: Gold, Neal, the several “unbreakable” curses
that always get broken laughably easily. This show does not want to let
consequences last which, after a while, cuts the emotional legs out from under
any fraught decision that’s being made. Regina might lose Henry if she saves
the world? So what! Emma will lose her powers if she gets kissed? No big deal!
This pattern makes it almost impossible to really care about any of the Life or
Death moments that the show presents us with.
This pattern also
gets in the way of characterization. I want
to care about the Charmings—I really do. But how can I? With the (admittedly big)
exception of getting to raise Emma, they get everything they want, all the
time, no questions asked. For instance, [highlight for spoilers] when Hook raises the
completely reasonable suggestion that perhaps Ariel can’t find Eric because
he’s dead, and that encouraging her would be raising “false hope,” [end
spoilers] David responds glibly, “In my experience, there’s no such thing. You
just have to believe.” Of course he says that, because that IS his experience.
But his experience is not only far removed from the real world from which
people are watching this show, but also removed from the “real world” people of
Storybrooke, who DO lose people (though at a smaller rate than you’d think) to
death, to memory-curses, to heartbreaking love-triangles, etc. The fact is, the
Charmings are impossibly privileged and their privilege makes it hard for me to
care about them. [Hightlight for spoilers] Their later faux-humble (“just a simple potluck”)
coronation ceremony for their new son [end spoilers] only serves to underscore
the weirdness of a royal family in modern-day America, a family for whom the
whole town will rally at a moment’s notice and to whom they will defer in
moments of crisis.
With a few
tweaks, the Charmings could be much more relatable, and the storyline more
fascinating. For instance, was the outcome of Snow killing Cora? Her heart
became tainted with spots of darkness. Unfortunately, we haven’t seen any
consequences of this change lately. How much more nuanced and true-to-life
would it be if Snow had to struggle with a dark side? [Highlight for spoilers] And, now that
Snow and David share that spotted heart, what could happen? [end spoiler] I’m
not talking about a sudden and catastrophic slide into Dark One-style evil, but
just a realistic internal conflict between the desire to do “what’s right” and
the urge to do things an easier, quicker, more ruthless way.
But, except for a
few moments of dark humor, this show shies away from representing
reality—whether that be realistic character motivations, realistic plot
outcomes, or even, as I mentioned above, story adaptations that stick more closely
to the “reality” of what fairy tales originally offered. Which is the real
tragedy of Once Upon a Time: how much
better it could be if it stuck more
closely to non-Disney versions of fairy tales. These stories were not
originally comforting yarns told at bedtime to send children off into a
pleasant dreamland; they were violent, scary, and dark. In short, they were
warnings. Look no farther than the big four in the Western tradition:
Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Snow White, Beauty and the Beast. In their
depictions of imprisonment, abuse, kidnapping, rape, bestiality, etc., even our
oft-repeated fairy tales strongly suggested that wonderful things like family
relations, sex, love, ambition, and leadership could be twisted into
frightening experiences. Here there be
dragons, fairy tales said, and pointed at our daily lives. (Also, fairies be crazy. For real.)
3 comments:
So basically you wish you were watching Game of Thrones.
I love Game of Thrones. I think it is, in almost all respects, a better show than OUAT. But it is not based on fairy tales and, even though they're probably overdone, I'm a sucker for fairy tale adaptations. I think fairy tales are part of our cultural mythology in a way that A Song of Ice and Fire is not. Questioning them, subverting them, shining a new light on them is useful and, to me, interesting and fun. What I really wish is that they had made Fables a TV show. Apparently it was on the table but then shelved once OUAT came on. Such a waste . . . (but not entirely, obviously, because it sparks discussion!)
Check out this list of fairy-tale retellings: http://www.kateforsyth.com.au/kates-blog/book-list-helen-lowes-favourite-fairy-tale-retellings
Post a Comment